Legal Opinion

Arkla Industries, Inc. v. Hoag

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1968No. 11003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Judge.

Arkla Industries, Inc. instituted this action for a declaratory judgment to determine the liability to the City of Shreveport for the paving of Grimmett Drive abutting the property sold by James H. Hoag to plaintiff. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff defendant has appealed.

The facts are not in dispute and were stipulated by the parties. On June 2, 1961, a contract was entered into whereby Hoag and Ingersoll Corporation agreed to sell to Arkla certain property fronting on Grim-mett Drive in Shreveport. Paragraph 3 of the contract entitled Representations, Warranties and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Etta Contracting Co. v. BruningSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. O'Shee v. ChaudoirSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Burke v. BurkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hingle Bros., Inc. v. BonuraLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Arkla Industries, Inc. v. HoagSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  3. Foti Enterprises, Inc. v. PizzolatoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API