Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Avalanche Maritime, Ltd. v. Parekh

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1999No. 97-55671Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcKEOWN, Circuit Judge

In this issue of first impression before the Ninth Circuit, the clear language of the statute, 11 U.S.C. § 546(a) (1994),1 mandates that the limitations period begins to run at the time of appointment of the permanent trustee under § 702. The statute says nothing about § 701 (interim trustee) and neither should we-to do so is to rewrite the statute. While I agree that the unsecured creditors had standing to pursue these claims, I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that those claims are time-barred because the statute of limitations begins to run upon appointment of an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. Walker Bennett MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc. v. Broach (In Re Lucas Dallas, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Ford v. Union Bank (In re San Joaquin Roast Beef)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API