Shedd v. Shedd
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in refusing to grant her motion for an upward modification of child support. We disagree. Plaintiff contends that the increase in defendant’s income from approximately $44,000 per year in 1990 to approximately $76,000 in 1999 constitutes a change in circumstances entitling her to increased child support. She contends that, because child support was fixed by the court rather than by agreement or stipulation of the parties, the increase in defendant’s income, standing alone, is a sufficient change…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Gluckman v. QuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Klein v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Strack v. StrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Heyward v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Love v. LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Weiss v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rosenthal v. BuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Fein v. GilchristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.