Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 12, 1997No. 97-2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

ANTOON, Judge.

Randy Darrell Carter (defendant) petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus contending that he is entitled to relief from his habitual offender sentence under Young v. State, 699 So.2d 624 (Fla.1997). We deny the petition.

In Young, the supreme court held that the decision to prosecute a defendant as an habitual felony offender is a prosecutorial function. In so ruling the supreme court rejected the argument that trial courts may sua sponte initiate the prosecution of a defendant as an habitual offender. Young v. State, 699 So.2d at 624. However, the court expressly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API