Legal Opinion

Hilton Bridge Const. Co. v. Gouverneur & O. Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, St. Louis county. - Action by the Hilton Bridge Construction Company against the Gouverneur & Oswegatchie Railroad Company and the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. From an order directing plaintiff, by supplemental summons and complaint, to bring in other parties defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMayham, P. J.

The record on this appeal shows that the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company and the Gouverneur & Oswegatchie Railroad Company are, respectively, corporations organized under the laws of the state of New York, and that the Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Company is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of New Jersey; that the Gouverneur & Oswegatchie Railroad Company was engaged in the construction of a railroad in the state of New York, and that on the 11th day of May, 1892, the above-named railroad companies entered into a contract whereby the first-named railroad company…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lawrence v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Everett, Clarke & Benedict v. Alpha Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  2. Caleo v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API