Legal Opinion

Carter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1974No. 48608PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. Paragraph (d) of Section 37 of the Civil Practice Act, as last amended by Section 10 of the Act of 1972, pp. 510, 530 (Code Ann. § 81A-137 (d)) provides that: "If a party . . . fails (1) to appear before the officer who is to take his deposition, after being served with proper notice, . . . the court in which such action is pending on motion may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and, among others, it may take any action authorized under subparagraphs (A), (B) and (C) of paragraph (b) (2) of this Section,” which subparagraph (C) provides as a sanction "an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Frye v. PyronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Smith v. ByessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Bratten Apparel, Inc. v. Lyons Textile Mill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Dixon v. Merry Bros. Brick & Tile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sta-Power Industries, Inc. v. AvantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Swindell v. SwindellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Cook v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Wetherington v. Koepenick & Horne, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API