Legal Opinion
Lenz v. Central Parking System of Neb.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2014No. S-13-930PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets LENZ v. CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF NEB. 453 Cite as
288 Neb. 453
dealer, motor vehicle salesperson, dealer’s agent, or auction dealer without the required license and remand the cause for a new trial. Because there was no evidence to show that Merchant was acting as an auction dealer, he cannot be retried on that alternative means of committing the offense. Thus, the new trial must be limited to the other three alternatives for which Merchant was charged. R eversed and remanded for a new trial. Gary M. Lenz, appellee, v. Central Parking System of Nebraska, I nc., and New…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Kimminau v. Uribe Refuse Service & EMC InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Foote v. O'Neill PackingNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Snipes v. VickersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Hilt Truck Lines, Inc. v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MerchantNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Callahan v. BrantNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- McNutt v. T & L Peterson TruckingNebraska Court of Appeals · 2021
- Nebuda v. Dodge Cty. Sch. Dist. 0062Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Stanko v. Smith, King, Simmons & Conn LawNebraska Court of Appeals · 2022