Henson v. State

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was convicted of being a habitual violator, driving under the influence of alcohol and failure to remain at the scene of an accident. He appeals. Held:

1. Defendant contends the State failed to prove that he was driving an automobile at the time in question. This contention is without merit. The State introduced evidence demonstrating that following an automobile collision, two men, defendant and Tommy Watkins, exited a Granada automobile and fled the scene; that no one else occupied the Granada; that, shortly thereafter, the men were apprehended and…