Legal Opinion

Buckholts v. Alsup

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 1, 1932No. 4264PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the case as' above).

The chief points presented for decision are that (1) the tax sale did not divest appellants of the title to their lands, but as to them was absolutely void, because the proceedings were against the unknown heirs of H. Alsup and did not include any other parties, either known or unknown, and because there were certain irregularities which were. enumerated; and (2) in the facts proven the appellants made proper and timely tender of the required amount of money, and they were legally entitled to redeem the land from the tax sale. As the conclusion reached upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. HenrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Carter v. MunzesheimerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. KellerTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McGraw v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for New Century Home Loan Trust 2006-2 v. Stockdick Land Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  2. Little v. DennisTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. ALCO LAND AND TIMBER COMPANY, INC. v. BaerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Macha v. CaramerosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Texas Building & Mortgage Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API