Legal Opinion

Roshelli v. Sperry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1983No. 8215SC801PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

In arguing that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment was erroneously granted, plaintiff acknowledges that the summons directed to the defendant was not issued until eleven days after the complaint was filed and more than three years after the occurrence of the injuries for which he seeks recovery. He contends that the applicable three-year statute of limitations, G.S. 1-52, was tolled when the action was commenced by the filing of his complaint on 27 March 1981 and continued to be tolled subject only to having the defendant properly served with a copy of the complaint and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roshelli v. SperryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Morton v. Blue Ridge Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tyson v. L'Eggs Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Franklin v. Winn Dixie Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Stack v. Union Regional Memorial Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Everhart v. SowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Selph v. PostCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API