Warrix v. Commonwealth

Opinion of the Court bt

Chief Justice Hurt

Reversing.

The appellant, Lige Warrix, was indicted for a violation of the prohibition statute of 1920'. The indictment, both in the accusative and descriptive portions, charged him with guilt of all the offenses denounced by section 2554a-l, Ky. Stats., 1922 — that is with manufacturing, selling, bartering, giving away, keeping for sale and transporting intoxicating liquors. A demurrer was offered to the indictment upon the ground that it violated *796section 126, Criminal Code, in that it accused him of the commission of six different offenses, no two of…