Legal Opinion

Canizaro Trigiani Architects v. Crowe

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 2002No. Nos. 35,939-CA, 35,940-CA, 35,941-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIt Gaskins, J.

The plaintiffs in these three consolidated eases, Canizaro Trigiani Architects, PA, Godfrey & Bassett Architects Ltd., and Burdine Materials, Inc., appeal from a trial court judgment finding that their foreign judgments against the defendant, Larry Crowe, made executory in this state in 1991, had prescribed and could not be revived. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court judgment.

FACTS

The plaintiffs obtained separate judgments against the defendant in Warren County, Mississippi, between September 22, 1986 and May 2, 1988.1 They then filed petitions in West Carroll Parish,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John Thomas Stanford v. Everett Utley, D/B/A Utley Trucking Company and E. C. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. Home Port Rentals, Inc. v. International Yachting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Succession of LucasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
  4. JR KEENAN CO. v. White House ApartmentsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Home Port Rentals, Inc. v. International Yachting Group Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berthelot v. BrinkmannLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Dawson, C. v. Sonju, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. Nielson v. SchmokeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. Poser Investments, Inc. v. Old National Hospitality CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API