Rhodesian General Finance & Trading Trust v. MacQuisten
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency appearing on the face thereof. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a limited company organized under the laws of England with its principal place of business in London; that on September 28, 1938, the plaintiff recovered a default judgment against the defendant in England; that the summons leading to the default judgment was served personally on the defendant in New York city on June 29, 1938, pursuant to order 11 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Judicature in England, which provides that such service may be made, if…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Bischoff v. WetheredSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Bank of China, Japan & the Straits, Ltd. v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Cowans v. Ticonderoga Pulp & Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Cowans v. Ticonderoga Pulp and Paper CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.