Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Mortel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 24, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.

A squatter proceeding was commenced against three occupants of the building by nailing and mailing one copy of the notice of petition and petition to the common entrance door of the building. The return on appeal does not indicate that petitioner made any attempt to contact the occupants or to have any agent visit the premises to discern how many families lived there. In effect, the city served the "building” in order to vacate same.

We affirm the finding of the court below that the actions of the city failed to comply…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MSG Pomp Corp. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Zamar v. FairCivil Court of the City of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 272 Sherman, LLC v. VasquezCivil Court of the City of New York · 2004
  2. Empire State Building Co. v. Progressive Catering Services, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  3. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Lyn-Jay, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API