Legal Opinion

State v. Brisco

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1912Published

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. —Hon. Benjamin J. Klene, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.

— The information in this case, filed in the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction by the Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, charges the defendant with a. violation of section 1192, Revised Statutes 1909, in that on the day named he had wrongfully, wilfully and unlawfully conducted and operated a barber college and barber school without first having obtained from the state board of barber examiners, a permit so to do. The information is substantially in compliance with the statute, specifying that the city of St. Louis is a city of over 5000 inhabitants and giving the names of the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. State v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API