Legal Opinion

Mechanics Bank v. Terry

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis County Circuit Court. — Hon. Rudolph Hiezel, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

Plaintiff as the indorsee for value before maturity sued the defendants as makers for the amount of the following note:

“$1,100.00. St. Louis, February 25, 1893.
“Sixty days after date we promise to pay to the order of A. K. Florida eleven hundred dollars, for value received, payable at the Mechanics Bank, St. Louis, with interest from maturity at the rate of eight per cent per annum until paid.
“Tebby Bbos.”

The answer was that defendants executed the note for accommodation upon the representation by plaintiff and the payee, A. K. Florida, that plaintiff held a deed of trust for the security of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Union Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Boyd v. PaulSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Yeoman v. HoshawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  4. Squier v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. WellsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. New York Life Insurance v. SmuckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API