Legal Opinion

Scheuermann v. Shamas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 8, 1957No. 57-123PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, CHAS., Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by both of the parties to a divorce suit, challenging the fee allowed by the circuit court to an attorney who represented the wife during the first part of the suit.

The appellee Shamas acted as the attorney for the appellant Elizabeth M. Scheuermann, in the suit for divorce which she filed against her husband on November 1, 1954. She dispensed with his services after the case became at issue, but before trial.

On the attorney’s motion, the court fixed his fee, allowing him $7,500, which the court required the plaintiff wife to pay to him at that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mabson v. ChristSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Atwell v. AtwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Pace v. PaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Bartlett & Sons Co. v. Pan-American Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kissling v. McCarthyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Galloway v. MusgraveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Schneider v. ManheimerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Frumkes v. Mortgage Guarantee Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Pavey v. PaveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API