Looper v. Thrash
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentAnnabelle Clinton Imber, Justice
This is an illegal-exaction case brought pursuant to Article 16, Section 13, of the Arkansas Constitution. It is not an ouster or usurpation case. As such, I do not understand the majority’s reliance on cases such as City of Berryville v. Binam, 222 Ark. 962, 264 S.W.2d 421 (1954), which involve whether a vacancy was created in an office.
If the majority is suggesting that a vacancy must be created in an office before salary paid to that officer may be recovered in an illegal-exaction claim, that is not a requirement that I can find expressed in our illegal-exaction cases. “This court has held…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Revis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Beshear v. RiplingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Hensley v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- City of Berryville v. BinamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954