Legal Opinion

Hubbard's Pier & Seafood, Inc. v. Rock Hall Clam & Oyster Co.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 13, 1974No. 468Published

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, C. J.

Whether Hubbard’s Pier and Seafood, Inc. and Albert W. Woodfield (Lessors) or Rock Hall Clam & Oyster Co., Inc., Peter John Markos, Euripedes John Markos, and Evangelos John Markos (Lessees) are entitled to $1605 being held by the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Maryland depends upon the construction given a clause in a lease drafted by Lessors’ attorney and executed on 7 May 1965.1 The clause, paragraph 3, reads:

*439“It is mutually agreed that any oyster shells resulting from the Lessee’s oyster operation will belong to the Lessor herein, subject, however, to the necessary share…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Kelley Construction Co. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Foreman v. Melrod Ex Rel. Krick of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Hoffman v. GlockCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. U.S.I.F. Triangle Towers Corp. v. Rockwood Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API