Snedaker v. King
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bv the Court.
The decree in this case is an extreme instance of government by injunction. It attempts to govern, control, and direct personal relations and domestic affairs. Among other restrictions placed upon the defendant by this decree is that of remaining away from any place where plaintiff’s husband may be, and from interfering with plaintiff’s efforts to commurdcate with her husband, and with her efforts to regain his love, esteem,’ support, and conjugal relation. It would be only a little more extreme if the husband had been made á party defendant, and a mandatory injunction decreed…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Henley v. RockettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Pearce v. PearceWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Bank v. BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- White v. ThomsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Colbert v. Coney Island, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.