Legal Opinion

Suite v. Clinchfield Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided February 27, 1990No. 1139-88-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING EN BANC

Opinion

KOONTZ, C.J.

In Suite v. Clinchfield Coal Company, 8 Va. App. 554, 383 S.E.2d 21 (1989), a majority of a panel of this Court held that the employer’s application for hearing alleging a change in condition based on an attached medical report was sufficient to raise the issue of causal connection. Suite’s petition for rehearing en banc was heard on December 19, 1989. For the reasons stated in the panel’s majority opinion, we affirm. Additionally, we note that a February 8, 1988 report from Dr. James L. McCoy. Suite’s family physician, stated that Suite did not feel his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Suite v. Clinchfield Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rossello v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  2. Stump Trucking v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  3. Dynalectric Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  4. Keen Drilling, etc v. Jerry Asa SmithCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API