Legal Opinion
Van Heest v. Veech
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 2, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
58 N.J. Super. 427 (1959)
156 A.2d 301
RONALD VAN HEEST, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GEORGE VEECH, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Passaic County Court, Law Division.
Decided December 2, 1959.
Mr. August J. Hovorka, Jr., attorney for plaintiff.
Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys for defendant (Mr. Joseph T. Ryan, appearing; Mr. Arthur J. Blake, of counsel).
KOLOVSKY, A.J.S.C.
Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint in this personal injury negligence action on the ground that it was not filed within two years after the cause of action accrued, the period provided by the statute of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Erickson v. . MacYNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Warinner v. NugentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Wendt v. . WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richard Thomas Carr and Doreen Carr v. United States of America, William Granville Reynolds, Sr., and Joseph B. BiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Bickford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Syzemore v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Worlow v. Mississippi River Fuel CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Murray v. RogersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.