Legal Opinion

Bank v. Buchanan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM M’MINN. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of McMinn County. S. A. Key, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtFolkes, J.

This is a bill by the bank to recover of Hale and Carver the sum of $85, being the amount of a note made -by Buchanan, líale, and Carver jointly, and discounted by the bank for the benefit of Buchanan, the other makers being, *33as between the parties, sureties for Buchanan, credit being given solely to Hale and Carver.

At its maturity said note was surrendered and canceled upon the delivery to the bank by Buchanan of another note for the same amount, purporting to be executed by said Buchanan, and 'McKamy and Bond, which was accepted by the bank in renewal of the first note. The last note was…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Sparta v. YowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. War Finance Corp. v. ReadyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
  3. First National Bank of Sparta v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  4. Godfrey v. CrislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Smith v. PowersDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API