Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Heck v. New York Catholic Protectory

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the New York Catholic Protectory,., from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the. * first department, of May, 1885, reversing an order of the Special Term which discharged John Yan Heck, the child of the relator,.. from the custody of defendant The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

A police justice of the city of New York, on the - 5th day of November, 1884, committed John Yan Heck, a boy of the age of nine years, to the Catholic Protectory for begging in the streets, in violation, as the commitment asserted, of the Consolidation Act of 1882, of the Penal Code and of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Under which of these acts the magistrate proceeded he did not at all determine, and we have no means of knowing. The commitment directed that the child should be and remain under the guardianship of the Protectory “ until therefrom discharged in manner prescribed by law.”…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Wisconsin Industrial School for Girls v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Woods v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. People Ex Rel. Van Riper v. New York Catholic ProtectoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Weber v. DoustWashington Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API