Legal Opinion

Lauer v. Yetzer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 1897No. Appeal, No. 154PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 154, Nov. T., 1896, by defendant,- from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Aug. T., 1894, No. 121, on verdict for plaintiff. Assumpsit on a promissory note. Before Ermentrout, P. J. The facts sufficiently appear from tbe charge of the court, which is as follows: Prank P. Lauer, the plaintiff, brings suit upon a promissory note dated November 21, 1898, signed by Albert B. Kuhns and Levi Kuhns, on which 'Joseph Yetzer became accommodation indorser.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 154, Nov. T., 1896, by defendant,- from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Aug. T., 1894, No. 121, on verdict for plaintiff. Assumpsit on a promissory note. Before Ermentrout, P. J. The facts sufficiently appear from tbe charge of the court, which is as follows: Prank P. Lauer, the plaintiff, brings suit upon a promissory note dated November 21, 1898, signed by Albert B. Kuhns and Levi Kuhns, on which 'Joseph Yetzer became accommodation indorser. There is no dispute about the manner in which the note was given. It is admitted that Kuhns was in the saloon business, and that this note was…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This was an action of assumpsit on a negotiable promissory note for $550, given by one Albert Kuhns, with the defendant, Joseph Yetzer, as indorser, to the plaintiff, for the stock and fixtures of a saloon.

The defendant claimed that subsequently, at the request of plaintiff’s agent, Kuhns transferred the title to the stock and fixtures, and consented to the transfer of the saloon license to one Joseph Steigerwald, upon the sole consideration of the plaintiff’s promise made to Kuhns, to release the defendant from any further liability on the note in suit. Although the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCartney ex rel. First National Bank v. KippSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. N. Holmes & Sons v. Briggs & DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Hunter v. MoulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  4. Shepherd v. BuschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. League v. Waring & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens' Bk. of Wind Gap v. LipschitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Le Bar, to Use v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Peoples National Bank v. BartelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Stewart v. Pen Argyl National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Winters v. WolfskillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API