Legal Opinion

Woodworth v. City of Kalamazoo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1903No. Docket No. 38PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo; Adams, J. Case by Hattie A. Woodworth against the city of Kalamazoo for personal injuries caused by a defective sidewalk. From a judgment for defendant on demurrer to the declaration, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff was injured on the 5th day of May, 1901, by falling ón a defective sidewalk in the defendant city of Kalamazoo. Her claim was presented to the city council on the 24th day of March, 1902. The council referred it to a committee, and the committee fixed a time and place for hearing. Plaintiff' appeared before the committee and offered to present her evidence. The committee refused to hear it or to pass upon it because, among other reasons, it was barred by the limitation in the charter. A committee report was made to the council, recommending the claim be not allowed, for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Davidson v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Blumrich v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reed v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Heims v. School Dist. of Davison Twp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In the Matter of LandaalMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Staub v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. State v. J. H. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API