Rozen v. Grattan
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Commissioner.
The parties will be referred to by their designation in the trial court. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant on his counterclaim and judgment was so entered. Plaintiff’s timely motion for new trial was sustained by the trial court and defendant appeals. In view of the circumstances of this appeal, only a brief statement of the factual situation will be necessary.
Both plaintiff’s cause of action and defendant’s counterclaim arose out of an automobile accident which occurred on February 12, 1960, at the intersection of Hampton Avenue and Arsenal Street in the City…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shepard v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Page v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Max v. SpaethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Wilson v. ToliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Fenton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Forsythe v. StarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Stubblefield v. SealsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Kerr v. Grand Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Blum v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. WoepkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967