Legal Opinion

State v. Oberlton

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 4, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINBERG, J.S.C.

I write this opinion in order to express my respectful disagreement with the opinion of another trial court in State v. Harrison, 236 N.J.Super. 69, 564 A.2d 128 (Law Div.1989) and therefore hold that tinted windows on a motor vehicle do give rise to an articulable and reasonable suspicion of a motor vehicle violation and therefore justify a police stop of the vehicle.

These are the facts. On March 1, 1992 a Camden City Police Officer pulled over a white Toyota occupied by the defendants because it had tinted material on the windshield. Neither the driver nor the passenger…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. State v. DouglasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CohenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  2. State ex rel. R.M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  3. State v. David L. Smith (085635) (Mercer County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API