Waite v. City of Santa Cruz
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
This is an action at law upon municipal bonds.
1Opinion of the Court
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
This is an action at law to recover the sum of $23,100, claimed to be due on 9 refunding bonds and 282 interest coupons of $50 each, attached to the bonds sued on and other refunding bonds, alleged to have been issued by the defendant on the 16th day of April, 1894, payable on April 15, 1895. The action necessarily' involves questions relating to the validity of 360 refunding bonds of $1,000 each, purporting to have been issued by the defendant on the 16th day of April, 1894. The circumstances under which these bonds were issued may be briefly stated as follows: On…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dixon County v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Town of Coloma v. EavesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chamski v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Thompson v. Village of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Board of County Commr's. of Day County v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. George S. Good & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Pine Mountain Iron & Coal Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.