Legal Opinion

May v. Brueshaber

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1995No. S95A0979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

The appellants, Dale and Elmira May, are neighbors of the ap-pellee, John Brueshaber. The Mays filed this action to enjoin Brueshaber from constructing two chicken houses on his property. At the close of the trial on the Mays’s request for a permanent injunction, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of Brueshaber. The trial court later awarded Brueshaber expenses of litigation and attorney fees on the ground that the Mays’s action lacked substantial justification as defined by OCGA § 9-15-14. The Mays appeal from both orders. Because we conclude that a factual question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coker v. BirgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. Benton v. PittardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. Bella Casa, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Superior Farm Management, LLC v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Terrell v. PayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Payne v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. MILLEN v. GEORGIA RENEWABLE POWER LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API