Legal Opinion

McCormick v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 1, 2018No. A159931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

*200*199Plaintiff was severely injured when, while visiting Cove Palisades State Park, he dove into Lake Billy Chinook and hit his head on a submerged boulder. He sued the state, alleging that the state's negligence causally contributed to his injuries in a number of ways. The state moved for summary judgment, contending that ORS 105.682, the recreational immunity statute, barred plaintiff's claims against it because plaintiff was engaged in a recreational activity at the time of his injuries. Plaintiff opposed the motion, arguing, among other things, that the statute did not apply to Lake Billy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Landis v. LimbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Ortega v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCormick v. State Parks and Recreation Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. McCormick v. State Parks and Recreation Dept.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Ortega v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API