Legal Opinion

MATTER OF McALLISTER

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1991No. Supreme Court Disciplinary 728, 729, 731, 732, 733, 742, 743, 744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

These disciplinaries stem from a default judgment entered against the respondent, J. Dunham McAllister, by the special master. The Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board refused to open default. The Review Panel reserved its ruling on final discipline pending an investigation by the Committee on Lawyer Impairment (the Committee), and recommended to this Court that McAllister be suspended from the practice of law until the Committee completed its report on McAllister. McAllister sought to have us open the default.

On November 7, 1990, this Court declined to open default. Moreover, the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In THE MATTER OF DUNHAM McALLISTERSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. In re McAllisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. In re McAllisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API