Legal Opinion · Dissent

Usher v. Department of Industrial Relations

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1954No. 6 Div. 528Published

1DissentGoodwyn, Justice

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals was granted to review the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Usher v. Department of Industrial Relations, 37 Ala. App. 698, 75 So.2d 159.

As I see it, the question presented, stated simply, is this: When it is determined that an individual’s unemployment is “directly due to a labor dispute”, is he nevertheless entitled to benefits under the Alabama Unemployment Compensation Act, Code 1940, Tit. 26, Chapter 4, §§ 180-252, as amended, if it be found that he was not involved in any way in such labor dispute? To answer the question calls for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Department of Industrial Relations v. DrummondAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API