Legal Opinion

Armburst v. Cox Broadcasting Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 8, 1968No. 43451PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

All the specifications of negligence against Cox relate in one way or another to the question of whether the negligence which actually caused the plaintiff’s injury was within that defendant’s range of foreseeability. Cox was within the terms of the permit granted it in routing the parade as it did, in erecting the reviewing stand, and in advertising the event and thereby causing a crowd to gather in the immediate vicinity. Whether one who causes a crowd or group of people to foregather for some purpose such as a parade is liable for an injury suffered by one spectator at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacOn Telegraph Publishing Co. v. GradenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Davis v. City of ToccoaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Douglasville v. QueenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Queen v. City of DouglasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Mion Construction Company, Inc. v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Rutledge v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. City of Douglasville v. QueenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API