Legal Opinion

Quinn Wire & Iron Works v. Boyd

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

This is an action on account of a promissory note executed by Otto Sukut. Sukut died in December, 1916. The note in question fell due in January, 1917. Tbe defendants, Augustus Roberts and Augusta Sukut, were appointed and qualified as administrators. Notice to creditors was duly published, the first publication bring on March 3, 1917. The notice required that all claims should be presented to the administrators at the office of Augustus Roberts in Fargo. On March 21, 1917, the claim was presented to the defendant Roberts. Subsequently and at the request of Roberts, the original note was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jasper v. HazenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Lloyd Mortgage Co. v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bergh v. John Wyman Farm Land & Loan Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Lambert v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. SouthAllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andersen v. ReslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Roberts v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Novak v. NovakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hanson v. CoolNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API