Legal Opinion

Hopka v. Forbes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

On January 21, 1930, plaintiff commenced a forcible entry and detainer action to recover possession of a building in Klamath Falls, Oregon, which he had leased to the defendant Forbes for a period of five years beginning January 14, 1925. The lease contained the following provision:

“3. At least thirty (30) days before the expiration of the term of the lease the lessee shall give the lessor written notice of an intention to surrender said premises at the expiration of such term and if such notice be not given, the lessee shall be liable for an additional monthly instalment of rent at the same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harding v. KuessnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Stevenson v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bell v. SpainOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hopka v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Pierson v. LawyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warnemunde v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API