Legal Opinion

Steel v. Young

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the common pleas of Westmoreland county. This was an action of covenant, brought by Joseph Young against John Steel, surviving guardian and trustee of Alexander Campbell, an habitual drunkard. The declaration set out that Alexander Campbell, before inquisition found, had entered into the covenant to pay, upon which the action was brought, &c. The defendant pleaded specially that the covenant was of Alexander Campbell, and not of him the defendant.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the common pleas of Westmoreland county. This was an action of covenant, brought by Joseph Young against John Steel, surviving guardian and trustee of Alexander Campbell, an habitual drunkard. The declaration set out that Alexander Campbell, before inquisition found, had entered into the covenant to pay, upon which the action was brought, &c. The defendant pleaded specially that the covenant was of Alexander Campbell, and not of him the defendant. To which the plaintiff replied specially, setting forth the inquisition and proceedings, and that effects of Alexander Campbell to an…

1Per curiam

—A person found to be an habitual drunkard is not civilly dead, so as to transfer his rights and responsibilities to his trustees as administrators. The inquisition devolves on them the same duties that an inquisition of lunacy devolves on his com, mittee, who are certainly not chargeable with his actions. So far is this principle carried, that such committee cannot sue, even inequity, without making him a party, It is impossible to sustain the present action,

Judgment reversed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Justice v. OttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Anstock v. Director General of Railroads, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1921
  3. In re Pietsch, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API