Legal Opinion

Medling v. Abraham Lincoln Life Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

Plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Welton K. Foster, deceased, instituted this suit upon a policy of insurance issued by defendant upon tbe life of said Welton K. Foster, deceased, seeking to recover $2000, the face of the policy, together with penalty and attorney fees for vexatious delay. On trial to a jury, plaintiff was returned a verdict in the sum of $2,017.50 on the policy and the further sums of $100 and $200 as penalty and attorney fees, respectively, on the theory that defendant vexatiously and without reasonable cause refused to pay the amount due under the policy.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Non-Royalty Shoe Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  2. Lafferty v. Kansas City Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Harris v. Security Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Hay v. Bankers Life Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Berryman v. Maryland Motor Car Ins.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Texas Prudential InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Wilson v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Connor v. United InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Dimension Church v. Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API