Legal Opinion

Block v. Ottenberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1907Published

Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of New York denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to discontinue the action.

1Opinion of the CourtErlaktger, J.

The order should be affirmed. Admitting that the authorities abundantly establish a plaintiff’s right to discontinue an action whenever after issue joined he shall determine so to do, the authorities are equally clear that the rule is subject to successful objection on the part of a defendant where either a counterclaim has been interposed, “ or when equities exist which might be defeated, or a defendant otherwise prejudiced, if the leave to discontinue was granted.” Telephonine Co. v. Douthitt, 115 App. Div. 362. The answers set up an affirmative defense, sufficient, if alleged by way of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Telephonine Co. of America v. DouthittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API