Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Bekenstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 20, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
The action is upon a promissory note indorsed by the defendant, appellant, the Katz Garment Co., Inc. Upon the trial an issue of fact was presented by the testimony; as to whether or not the indorsement of the promissory note in suit, which was made by one Max Bekenstein, payable to his order and first indorsed by him and subsequently indorsed by the Katz Garment Co., Inc., was indorsed by the said defendant, appellant, without consideration and for the accommodation of said Bekenstein, or whether the indorsement of the defendant, appellant, was for value. Upon the trial the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- National Park Bank v. German-American Mutual Warehousing & Security Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Jacobus v. . Jamestown Mantel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Foot v. SabinNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Fox v. Rural Home Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chase National Bank v. RosenbaumCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
- Rodkind v. Khosrovshahi Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952