Gontarchick v. City of Pottsville
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
This appeal concerns the appropriate method, under the Third Class City Code, for calculating police pension benefits.
Appellants, Ronald Gontarchick and Marlin Reed, each served as full-time police officers for Appellee, City of Potts-ville, for more than twenty years. Upon retirement, both submitted demands for pension benefits to the City’s police pension fund, as established under the Third Class City Code.1 *3The demands were based on each officer’s total gross compensation in the last month of his service, including compensatory-time, overtime pay, clothing allowance,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Borough of Nazareth v. Nazareth Borough Police Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- City of Lower Burrell v. City of Lower Burrell Wage & Policy CommitteeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Kosey v. City of Washington Police Pension BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Crouse v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SWB YANKEES LLC v. WintermantelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Gontarchick v. City of PottsvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- SWB YANKEES LLC v. WintermantelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012