Foster v. Weber
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentW. Sharp, Judge
I respectfully dissent. In my view, ap-pellees (the Webers) were not entitled to final summary judgment because they failed to overcome by affidavit or otherwise, appellant’s (Foster’s) defense of usury, which he raised as an affirmative defense, and which he supported with two affidavits filed in opposition to the summary judgment motion. The Webers filed the motion for summary judgment, and they, not Foster, had the burden of showing there was no material issue of law or fact as to their right to prevail against any defense raised by Foster.
The Webers sued Foster and three other individuals…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Landers v. MiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Lashley v. BowmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Aagaard-Juergensen, Inc. v. LettelierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Samuels v. Magnum Realty Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.