Legal Opinion

Mulkey v. Blankenship

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 28, 1976No. 48529PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

Plaintiffs, now appellants, brought this action as officials of Highway Assembly *399Church alleging interference with their right to worship and in the operation of the church by the defendants, now appel-lees. Defendants denied such interference. Their answer alleges they are the proper officials.

On a June 5, 1974, hearing, the trial court denied a temporary injunction and ordered the holding of a congregational meeting. Defendants sought dismissal, but that motion was overruled under a June 24, 1974, order. There, the trial court determined jurisdiction over the matter for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Story v. HefnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Wolozyn v. BegarekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Briggs v. McAdams Pipe & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Oklahoma District Council of the Assemblies of God v. New Hope Assembly of God Church of Norman, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. DUKE v. DUKESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  4. DUKE v. DUKESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API