Legal Opinion

Woldenberg v. Haines

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Harney:' Morton D. Clieeord, Judge. Proceeding by L. Woldenberg against Fred Haines to review the judgment of a justice’s court. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is a special proceeding to review the judgment of a justice’s court of Harney County. The transcript shows that plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant in the Justice’s Court of Burns District, to recover the sum of $2.50, alleged to be due on account of the sale and delivery of certain goods, wares, and merchandise. The answer, after denying the material allegations of the complaint, sets up a counterclaim of $34.17, and, the reply having put in issue the allegations of new matter therein, the venue was changed, upon defendant’s motion, to the Justice’s Court of Harney…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Aurora Fire Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Christ v. FlannaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Ex parte WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hazard v. WasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re GrayeMontana Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API