Guenther v. Gilchrist Improved Jar Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 199 Oct. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1904, No. 988, making absolute rule to open judgment in case of Emil Guenther v. Gilchrist Improved Jar Company, Incorporated, and G. O. Angelí. Rule to open judgment. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
The lease of Isaac Mattson, by his agent, Felix Isman, to the Gilchrist Improved Jar Company, Inc., was for two years from September 1, 1902, for the yearly rent or sum of |420 . . . . and specifically provided that “ The lessee shall and will not assign this lease or underlet the premises or any part thereof, nor make, nor allow to be made, any alterations, improvements or additions thereto, without first having the consent in writing of the lessor, and after such consent having been given, unless otherwise* agreed upon in writing, all alterations, improvements and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. LadewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Hemphill v. FlynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
- Lyons v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Hoffman v. HafnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905