Legal Opinion

Angelone v. City of Rochester

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1981PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Richard J. Cardamone at the Appellate Division (72 AD2d 445).

We note, however, that we have no occasion to consider whether that portion of the city’s ordinance which establishes an equitable claim for a tax refund on behalf of all taxpayers within the city, considered separately, would constitute an unconstitutional gift (see NY Const, art VIII, § 1). Inasmuch as the local legislature obviously intended the ordinance to operate only as an integrated unit, we cannot…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Angelone v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. ChiarellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Corporate Property Investors v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. City of Rochester v. ChiarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Duffy v. WetzlerNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  5. City of Rochester v. ChiarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API