Legal Opinion

Mintz v. Hornblower & Weeks

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1936No. 7165PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Suit by appellee, stockbrokers, against appellant, to recover $19,038.70, with interest, balance due upon guaranties alleged to have been made by him of the brokerage accounts of Beatrice Mintz Fink and S. Lemberg. Appellant denied liability and pleaded a set-off of (1) $37,695.66, being the amount of alleged usurious interest charges made by appellee against him; and (2) $9,410.79, a balance which had been used by it in reduction of the amounts claimed on the Fink and Lemberg guaranties.

At the close of the evidence each party i moved for a directed verdict. The court *33sust…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Thurston v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. In re FishelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911
  5. Bennett v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farmers Union Oil Co. of New England v. MaixnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API