Legal Opinion

Stratis v. Andreson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 24, 1926PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a suit wherein minority stockholders in a Massachusetts corporation seek to recover for the benefit of the corporation excessive salaries alleged to have been paid to the defendants as its officers. The case was referred to a master. Since there is no report of the evidence, his findings of fact must be accepted as final and true. Smith v. Lloyd, 224 Mass. 173.

It appears from the master’s report that the corporation, judged by its receipts, has been highly successful, increasing from about $32,000 in 1915 to something in excess of $223,000 *538in 1922. Three of the defendants are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. von Arnim v. American Tube WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Elliott v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Bartlett v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Godley v. . Crandall Godley Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Matthews v. Headley Chocolate Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API