United States v. Murphy
District Court, D. Delaware
This was an indictment against Edward Murphy for an alleged violation of the neutrality laws. The case was heard on a motion to set aside the forfeiture of the recognizance for defendant’s appearance and answer.
1Opinion of the Court
BRADFORD, District Judge.
The defendant, Murphy, having been charged with a violation of section 5286 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, embodying certain provisions of the neutrality laws, was arrested by virtue of a warrant issued by a United States commissioner. Afterwards, October 10, 1896, he, with Ralph De Soto as surety, entered into a recognizance in the sum of .$1,500 for appearance and answer in this court. The condition of the recognizance, aside from the specification of the offense charged, reads as follows:
*895“The condition of this recognizance is such that, if the said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- People, Ex Rel. Wood v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. KinneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1920
- In Re Press Printers & PublishersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- United States v. ForeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
- Babcock Printing Press Mfg. Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926