Ex parte Sontag
California Supreme Court
Applicatiox for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts arc stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
The petitioner was committed to prison by the Superior Court, as being guilty of contempt in refusing to answer the question (upon motion to set aside an indictment) whether he as grand juror voted for finding the indictment.
The form of the oath, in general use for centuries, binds the grand juror to preserve inviolate the secrets of the grand jury room. Public policy would seem to forbid vain disclosures made to gratify idle curiosity. “ But,” say Thompson and Merriam, “ when, for the purposes of public justice, or for the protection of private rights, it becomes necessary, in a court of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Low's caseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1827
- People v. WymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Daily Journal Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.